The SIMPLE Argument That RATTLED GodLogic In A LIVE DEBATE
The SIMPLE Argument That RATTLED GodLogic In A LIVE DEBATE!
The case is decided
It wasAvery.
Avery won because TMA’s central counterexample, Deuteronomy 29:6, fell apart when Avery showed verse 1 identifies those words as the Lord’s and TMA conceded that in the wider context. Avery then pressed a consistency question from the Quran about who is speaking, and TMA repeatedly refused to answer it while accusing Avery of games. Avery had already answered TMA’s demand for New Testament claims by citing Revelation and Hebrews, and TMA’s pushback relied on a point he did not sustain. TMA’s interruptions and insults did not repair that conceded point.
Crowd verdict
1 voteThe model called this for Avery. Who do you say won?
Spread the verdict
Receipts attached. The link opens at the deciding moment.
Another case?
Try the next debate.