The relationship between Christianity, the Alt-Right, and the origins of modern morality.
The BANNED Jay Dyer vs Richard Spencer Debate (Only Surviving Clips)
Adversarial discussion on whether Christianity is a civilizing force or a source of modern liberal egalitarianism.
The case is decided
It wasRichard Spencer.
Richard Spencer defended 2 of 4 claims, while Jay Dyer defended 2 of 3. The balance of successfully defended claims across the debate favors Richard Spencer.
Score panel — adjudicator
Crowd verdict
1 voteThe model called this for Richard Spencer. Who do you say won?
Spread the verdict
Receipts attached. The link opens at the deciding moment.
Jay Dyer
Orthodox Christianity provides a coherent, non-relativistic moral framework and a path to deification (theosis) that transcends modern political categories.
- Claims raised3
- Defended2
- Refuted1
- Unanswered0
- Concessions0
- Fallacies (weighted)0.0
Richard Spencer
Modern morality is a weaponized evolution of Christian egalitarianism; he advocates for a 'will to power' and a race-affirming morality.
- Claims raised4
- Defended2
- Refuted1
- Unanswered1
- Concessions0
- Fallacies (weighted)0.8
Definitional alignment
When the same word means two different things, the entire exchange becomes contestable. Below: every term where the debaters did not agree on a definition.
- Christianitynot alignedJay Dyer
The historical, liturgical, and dogmatic tradition of the Orthodox Church focused on theosis.
Richard SpencerA historical force that has devolved into a 'liberal heresy' promoting egalitarianism and world-denial.
High
- Moralitynot alignedJay Dyer
Objective moral absolutes rooted in divine order.
Richard SpencerA social construct or 'will to power' used to define in-groups and out-groups.
High
Another case?
Try the next debate.