The existence of God and the problem of suffering
William Lane Craig vs Alex O'Connor: God and Suffering
Adversarial dialogue on philosophical arguments for theism vs atheistic challenges regarding suffering and cosmology.
The case is decided
It wasAlex O'Connor.
Alex O'Connor defended 2 of 2 claims, while William Lane Craig defended 0 of 3. The balance of successfully defended claims across the debate favors Alex O'Connor.
Score panel — adjudicator
Crowd verdict
1 voteThe model called this for Alex O'Connor. Who do you say won?
Spread the verdict
Receipts attached. The link opens at the deciding moment.
William Lane Craig
Christian theism is supported by six exterior arguments (cosmological, teleological, moral, etc.) and interior personal experience.
- Claims raised3
- Defended0
- Refuted2
- Unanswered1
- Concessions1
- Fallacies (weighted)0.6
Alex O'Connor
Agnostic atheist who finds theistic arguments (specifically the Kalam) unsound and points to suffering as a challenge to theism.
- Claims raised2
- Defended2
- Refuted0
- Unanswered0
- Concessions0
- Fallacies (weighted)0.0
Definitional alignment
When the same word means two different things, the entire exchange becomes contestable. Below: every term where the debaters did not agree on a definition.
- Godnot alignedWilliam Lane Craig
The supreme benefactor, creator, and personal being.
Alex O'ConnorAn entity whose existence is debated; often associated with all-loving/all-powerful attributes in the context of suffering.
High
- Actual Infinitenot alignedWilliam Lane Craig
A set with an infinite number of members that cannot exist in reality.
Alex O'ConnorA mathematical concept that may not be contradictory, even if unintuitive.
High
Another case?
Try the next debate.