Atheism Debate | Jesusandwhatnot vs. Bornagainatheist | HEATED
Atheism Debate | Jesusandwhatnot vs. Bornagainatheist | HEATED
The case is decided
It wasJesusandwhatnot.
Jesusandwhatnot presented a structured argument from motion to a first unmoved mover and pure actuality, and he repeatedly explained why the first cause cannot have potency. Born again atheist mostly mocked philosophy, interrupted, and demanded evidence without directly rebutting the key premises; she even said she agreed with the premises while objecting that the argument could fit other worldviews. That objection has some force, but she never showed a flaw in the reasoning or offered a positive atheist case. So Jesusandwhatnot won the debate.
Crowd verdict
1 voteThe model called this for Jesusandwhatnot. Who do you say won?
Spread the verdict
Receipts attached. The link opens at the deciding moment.
Another case?
Try the next debate.