Daniel Haqiqatjou Vs Nick Matau | Should Americans Support the US Government's War on Iran?
Daniel Haqiqatjou Vs Nick Matau | Should Americans Support the US Government's War on Iran?
The case is decided
It wasDaniel Haqiqatjou.
Daniel kept the debate tied to the harm the war would do to Americans: higher gas prices, economic costs, and the risk of another long Middle East war. Nick scored points on Iran's proxy record and on Daniel's Talmud and Hadith detours, but he often called Daniel's arguments fallacies instead of answering them, and he conceded that gas prices hurt Americans in the short term. Daniel also stressed that the US was negotiating with Iran before attacking, and Nick never convincingly rebutted that. In a messy but close debate, Daniel had the stronger overall case for why Americans should not support the war.
Crowd verdict
1 voteThe model called this for Daniel Haqiqatjou. Who do you say won?
Spread the verdict
Receipts attached. The link opens at the deciding moment.
Another case?
Try the next debate.