CRASHOUT DEBATE | “Is Homosexuality Good?” | Jesusandwhatnot vs “God.of_logic”
CRASHOUT DEBATE | “Is Homosexuality Good?” | Jesusandwhatnot vs “God.of_logic”
The case is decided
It wasJoel.
God.of_logic argued that homosexuality violates natural law because men and women are ordered toward each other through active and passive generative powers. Joel pressed him on definitions and demanded a biological necessary-and-sufficient condition for being a man, and God.of_logic answered that the condition is a metaphysical essence rather than a physical part, which Joel rejected but did not refute. Joel scored by getting God.of_logic to admit homosexuality is natural under the ordinary dictionary definition, but he never showed why God.of_logic's essentialist framework was false, and he often interrupted, insulted, and dismissed arguments as nonsense instead of engaging them. God.of_logic stayed more coherent and civil, so he wins.
Crowd verdict
1 voteThe model called this for Joel. Who do you say won?
Spread the verdict
Receipts attached. The link opens at the deciding moment.
Another case?
Try the next debate.